Smoking and overweight associated with masked uncontrolled hypertension: a Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) Sub-Study.

PURPOSE: The Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) Study investigated the relationship between target office diastolic blood pressure (BP) ≤80, ≤85 or ≤90 mmHg and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in 18,790 patients aged 50-80 years. The home BP sub-study enrolled 926 patients and the aim was to clarify whether the separation into the BP target groups in the office prevailed in the out-of-office setting. The present study aimed to identify variables that characterised masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) and white coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sub-study participants took their home BP when office BP had been up titrated. The cut-off for normal or high BP was set to ≥135/85 mmHg at home and ≥140/90 mmHg in the office. We analysed data by using multivariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression with home and office BP combinations as the dependent variables. RESULTS: WUCH was associated with lower body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% confident intervals (CIs) 0.88-0.96, p < 0.001). MUCH was associated with smoking (OR 1.89, 95% CIs 1.25-2.86, p = 0.0025) and with lower baseline heart rate (OR 0.98, 95% CIs 0.97-0.99, p = 0.03) and higher BMI (OR 1.03, CIs 1.00-1.06, p = 0.04). MUCH remained associated with smoking (OR 2.76, 95% CIs 1.76-4.35, p < 0.0001) also when using ≥140/90 mmHg as the cut-off for both home and office BP. MUCH was also associated with higher BMI (OR 1.05, 95% CIs 1.01-1.09, p = 0.009) while WUCH was associated with lower BMI (OR 0.93, 95% CIs 0.90-0.97, p = 0.0005) when using ≥140/90 mmHg as a cut-off. CONCLUSION: Our data support that 'reversed or masked' treated but uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) is common and constitutes about 25% of treated hypertensive patients. This entity (MUCH) is rather strongly associated with current smoking and overweight while uncontrolled white coat (office) hypertension (WUCH) is associated with lower BMI.

Prevalence and Predictors of White Coat Hypertension among Newly-Diagnosed Hypertensive Patients in a Tertiary Health Centre in Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Failure to diagnose and adequately classify newly-diagnosed hypertensive patients may lead to non-recognition of White Coat Hypertension (WCH) and inappropriate use of antihypertensive medications. This study determined the prevalence and predictors of white coat hypertension among newly-diagnosed hypertensive patients in a tertiary health centre in Nigeria. METHODS: One hundred and twenty newly-diagnosed hypertensive patients and 120 controls were recruited for the study. All the participants had 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) using an oscillometric device (CONTEC®). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0. RESULTS: Out of 120 patients, 52 were males and the mean age was 44.2 ± 9.7 years whereas of the 120 controls, 53 were males and the mean age was 44.0 ± 7.5 years. The mean body mass index of the patients, BMI (27.0 ± 4.5kg/m2) was higher than control (24.1 ± 4.5kg/m2), p-value <0.001. The prevalence of WCH was 36.7%. The mean age and BMI of those with WCH were 43.3 ± 11.4 years and 26.4 ± 4.5kg/m2 respectively. Females constituted a greater proportion (70.5%). In multivariate analysis, high level of education and being overweight or obese were significant determinants of WCH. CONCLUSION: High prevalence of WCH existed among participants studied. High level of education and being obese were predictors of white coat hypertension. Hence, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring should be included as part of routine work-up for newly-diagnosed hypertensive patients in order to limit the number of those who may be committed to lifelong antihypertensive medications with its unwanted side effects.

Attended Versus Unattended Automated Office Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Automated office blood pressure (AOBP) has been proposed for blood pressure (BP) assessment in the office because it shows a strong association with the awake ambulatory BP. However, it remains unknown whether the presence or absence of an observer modulates AOBP readings. AIM: To determine the difference between unattended and attended AOBP measurements through systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched the PubMed and the Cochrane Collaboration Library and we screened the references' list of relevant reports to identify potentially eligible articles. For included studies, quality was assessed by using the Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. The weighted pooled BP difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) between unattended and attended AOBP was estimated under the random effects model. RESULTS: Twelve studies (1762 subjects) were included. The systolic and diastolic BP difference between unattended and attended AOBP measurements was - 3.66 (- 6.58 to - 0.75) and - 1.67 (- 2.78 to - 0.55) mmHg, respectively. Heterogeneity across studies was high (I2 = 97,1% for systolic and I2 = 89% for diastolic BP, P < 0.001) and was partially determined by the sequence of performing unattended and attended BP measurements, the device used for AOBP, the geographic region in which studies were performed and the presence of a resting period before unattended AOBP. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the high heterogeneity, we cannot rely on the weighted pooled estimate. However, the available evidence suggests that attended AOBP yielded higher systolic and diastolic BP levels and it seems that the procedural methodology determines partially the statistical heterogeneity across studies.

White-coat, masked and sustained hypertension detected by home blood pressure monitoring in adolescents: prevalence and associated factors.

PURPOSE: Population-based studies estimating prevalence's of white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension in non-European adolescents are needed, particularly in developing countries. Aiming to determine these estimates and, additionally identify factors associated to these conditions this study was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study with a representative sample of secondary school students from a Brazilian state capital. Office measurements were performed with validated semi-automatic devices. Home BP (blood pressure) monitoring protocol included two day-time and two evening-time measurements over 6 days. Adolescents' were classified as: normotensives (office and home BP <95th percentile); sustained hypertensives (office and home BP ≥95th percentile); white-coat hypertensives (office BP ≥95th percentile and home BP <95th percentile) and masked hypertensives (office BP <95th percentile and home BP ≥95th percentile). Logistic regression models were built to identify if sex, age, BMI and family history of HTN were independently associated with white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension. RESULTS: In a sample of 1024 adolescents, prevalence of white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension was 7.5%, 2.2% and 1.7%, respectively. Male sex was positively associated with white-coat hypertension (OR 2.68; 95%CI 1.58-4.54; p < 0.001). BMI was positively associated with both white-coat (OR 1.23; 95%CI 1.16-1.30; p < 0.001) and sustained hypertension (OR 1.19; 95%CI 1.11-1.29; p < 0.001). None of the independent variables were associated with masked hypertension in this population. CONCLUSION: The estimated prevalence of white-coat hypertension, masked and sustained hypertension in a population of non-European adolescents assessed by home BP monitoring was 7.5%, 2.2% and 1.7% respectively. Male sex was positively associated with white-coat hypertension in these adolescents while BMI was positively associated with both white-coat and sustained hypertension.

[Management of arterial hypertension]. / Management der arteriellen Hypertonie.

Arterial hypertension has a high prevalence and is a major risk factor for the development of cardiovascular diseases. It is a major contributor to worldwide morbidity and mortality and hence poses a huge socioeconomic burden. Despite great progress in perception, diagnosis and treatment of hypertension, blood pressure control is inadequate in less than half of the hypertensive patients (<140/90 mm Hg). The diagnosis of arterial hypertension starts in most patients with the conventional office blood pressure measurement. Out-of-office blood pressure measurement is an important adjunct, especially to unmask white-coat hypertension. To reach the right target blood pressure many effective antihypertensive drugs are available. By how much the blood pressure should be lowered is currently a matter of controversy. The 2013 European and the identical German national guidelines recommend a target blood pressure of <140/90 mm Hg for most patients. The recent SPRINT study revealed that some patients may benefit from an even lower blood pressure. This CME-article summarizes recent developments in the management of arterial hypertension and provides tips for daily practice based on these aims.

White-coat hypertension during coronary computed tomography angiography is associated with higher coronary atherosclerotic burden.

INTRODUCTION: White-coat hypertension (WCH) is a prevalent entity, which has been associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. AIM: Assess whether WCH is associated with a higher coronary atherosclerotic burden, evaluated by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring. METHODS: A total of 1362 patients who performed CCTA and simultaneous CAC for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) were prospectively enrolled in a single-center registry and divided into three groups: (A) patients with normal blood pressure (BP) (n=386); (B) patients with WCH (n=174; without a history of hypertension or antihypertensive medication, but with systolic BP ≥140 and/or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg before examination acquisition); and (C) patients with hypertension (n=802). The following coronary atherosclerotic markers were evaluated: CAC above the 50th percentile (CAC>p50), prevalence of CAD (any plaque), and obstructive CAD (plaque with>50% stenosis). RESULTS: Patients with WCH had a higher coronary atherosclerotic burden compared with patients with normal BP for all markers (30.5 vs. 19.4%, P=0.004 for CAC>p50; 50.6 vs. 36.8%, P=0.002 for CAD, any plaque; and 13.8 vs. 8.3%, P=0.045 for obstructive CAD). On multivariate analysis, WCH was an independent predictor of a CAC>p50 [odds ratio (OR) 1.563, 95% confidence interval 1.018-2.400, P=0.041], but not of the presence of CAD (any plaque) (OR 1.335, P=0.169) or obstructive CAD (OR 1.376, P=0.301). CONCLUSION: In this registry of patients, WCH was an independent predictor of a CAC above the p50. It was also associated with higher other markers of coronary atherosclerotic burden, such as the presence of CAD on CCTA, compared with patients with normal BP.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess the white-coat effect in an elderly East African population.

The authors hypothesized that published hypertension rates in Tanzania were influenced by the physiological response of individuals to blood pressure (BP) testing, known as the white-coat effect (WCE). To test this, a representative sample of 79 participants from a baseline cohort of 2322 people aged 70 years and older were followed to assess BP using conventional BP measurement (CBPM) and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). There was a significant difference between daytime ABPM and CBPM for both systolic BP (mean difference 29.7 mm Hg) and diastolic BP (mean difference 7.4 mm Hg). Rates of hypertension were significantly lower when measured by 24-hour ABPM (55.7%) than by CBPM (78.4%). The WCE was observed in 54 participants (68.4%). The WCE was responsible for an increase in recorded BP. Accurate identification of individuals in need of antihypertensive medication is important if resources are to be used efficiently, especially in resource-poor settings.

[White-coat hypertension].

White-coat hypertension (WCH) is defined by hypertensive blood pressure in the office with a normal blood pressure obtained by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) or home blood pressure (HBP) measurement in other situation. WCH occurs in 15-30% of untreated individuals with an elevated office blood pressure, and the incidence is especially high in the elderly people. The prognosis of WCH is recognized to be intermediate between normotension and sustained hypertension. We should carefully follow up WCH subjects because they have the risk of progressing to sustained hypertension and onset of cardiovascular events. Metabolic disorder would increase the cardiovascular risk of WCH.

A polymorphism in the major gene regulating serum uric acid associates with clinic SBP and the white-coat effect in a family-based study.

OBJECTIVES: Hyperuricemia associates with hypertension, but it is uncertain whether this relationship is causal in nature. Glucose transporter 9 (GLUT9) gene is a major genetic determinant of plasma uric acid levels in humans. Since polymorphisms are randomly distributed at mating (Mendelian randomization), studies based on GLUT9 polymorphisms may provide unconfounded assessment of the nature of the link between uric acid and hypertension. METHODS: We tested the association between uric acid, the rs734553 polymorphism of the GLUT9 gene and arterial pressure in a family-based study including 449 individuals in a genetically homogenous population in Southern Italy. RESULTS: Serum uric acid levels were strongly associated (P < 0.001) with all components of clinic and 24-h ambulatory blood pressures (BPs). However, only clinic SBP and the white-coat effect (the difference in clinic systolic and daytime systolic ambulatory blood pressure monitoring) associations remained significant after adjustment for classical risk factor and the estimated glomerular filtration rate. Serum uric acid was strongly associated with the risk allele (T) of the rs734553 polymorphism (P < 0.001). Furthermore, TT individuals showed higher clinic SBP (129 + SEM 1 mmHg) than GT (125 + 1 mmHg) and GG individuals (122 + 3 mmHg), as well as a higher white-coat effect (P = 0.02), confirming that the association between uric acid and these BP components is unconfounded by environmental risk factors. CONCLUSION: Results in this family-based study are compatible with the hypothesis that uric acid is a causal risk factor for hypertension. Trials testing uric acid-lowering interventions are needed to definitively establish the causal implication of hyperuricemia in human hypertension. [Corrected]

Muscle and skin sympathetic nerve traffic during physician and nurse blood pressure measurement.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that blood pressure assessment by a nurse markedly attenuates the pressor and tachicardic responses triggered by the physician blood pressure measurement. Whether and to what extent this attenuation reflects a different pattern of the neuroadrenergic responses to doctor or nurse blood pressure evaluation is unknown. METHODS: In 19 lean untreated mild essential hypertensive patients (age 39.1 ±â€Š2.4 years, mean ±â€ŠSEM), we measured beat-to-beat mean arterial pressure (Finapres), heart rate (ECG), and efferent postganglionic muscle and skin sympathetic nerve traffic [muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and skin sympathetic nerve activity (SSNA), respectively, by microneurography], before, during, and following a 10-min sphygmomanometric BP measurement by a doctor or by a nurse unfamiliar to the patients. Measurements were repeated at a 30-min interval to obtain, in separate periods, muscle and skin sympathetic nerve traffic recordings. Both the sequences (doctor vs. nurse and muscle vs. skin sympathetic nerve traffic) were randomized. RESULTS: A doctor visit induced sudden, marked, and prolonged blood pressure and heart rate increases, accompanied by a muscle sympathetic nerve traffic inhibition (average response: -18.1 ±â€Š4.3%, P < 0.01) coupled with a skin sympathetic nerve traffic excitation (average response: +46.1 ±â€Š5.5%, P < 0.01). In contrast, a nurse visit elicited blood pressure and heart rate responses markedly and significantly reduced (-72.1 ±â€Š11 and -81.7 ±â€Š13% respectively, P < 0.01) as compared with those seen during the doctor's visit. This was the case also for muscle and skin sympathetic neural responses (-44.3 ±â€Š9 and -65.6 ±â€Š13%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These data provide the first evidence that the blunted pressor and tachicardic responses to nurse's blood pressure measurements are accompanied by an attenuation of the adrenergic neural responses seen during the alerting reaction accompanying doctor's blood pressure measurement.

High ambulatory blood pressure in male professional football players.

BACKGROUND: No data exist on ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) in athletes. OBJECTIVES: To identify ABP and examine recommended follow-up of high office blood pressure (OBP) in male professional football players and secondary study indicators of sympathetic activity. METHODS: Players with high OBP (cases) from a previous screening of 594 players (n=28) were matched for age and ethnicity with players with optimal OBP (controls). High ABP was defined as a mean of ≥135/85 mm Hg during daytime and ≥120/75 mm Hg during night-time. The players replied to questions regarding follow-up of high OBP. High night-time ABP and lack of nocturnal dip (≤10% decline in average BP) were taken as indicators of increased sympathetic activity. RESULTS: 26 cases and 26 controls, mean age 28±4 years, were included. 15 (58%) of the cases had sustained hypertension and 11 (42%) white coat hypertension. Among the controls, 17 (65%) had normotension and 9 (35%) masked hypertension. ABP during night-time was high in 23 (88%) of the cases and in 16 (64%) of the controls, and nocturnal dip was absent in 9 (35%) and 11 (42%), respectively. 10 (38%) of the cases had no follow-up of high OBP. CONCLUSIONS: More than one-third of the players with optimal OBP had masked hypertension during daytime and more than half of all players had high ABP during night-time, which are novel findings in athletes. Together with the reduced nocturnal dip, this might indicate increased sympathetic activity. Follow-up of high OBP after preparticipation screening is random and should be organised.

Blood pressure measured in the clinic and at home during pregnancy among nulliparous and multiparous women: the BOSHI study.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension during pregnancy can cause serious problems during delivery, such as stroke, premature delivery, or low birthweight. Nulliparity is believed to be a risk factor for hypertension during pregnancy. However, the relationship between parity and blood pressure determined at home during pregnancy is still unknown. METHODS: We assessed the incidence of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia in 575 nulliparous and multiparous women. Also, we examined blood pressure measured in the clinic and at home among 530 normotensive pregnant women who received antenatal care at a maternity hospital in Japan. Clinic blood pressures (CBPs) were obtained by duplicate measurement at each antenatal care visit. The participants were also required to measure their own blood pressures every morning at home while they were pregnant. A linear mixed model was used for analysis of the blood pressure course throughout pregnancy. RESULTS: A total of 315 nulliparous and 215 multiparous women were entered into this study (mean age, 30.1 ± 4.6 years and 33.0 ± 4.1 years, respectively). CBP levels during pregnancy among nulliparous women were significantly higher than among multiparous women (P = 0.02/P <0.0001 for systolic/diastolic blood pressure), whereas there were no significant differences in home blood pressure (HBP) levels during pregnancy between the two groups (P = 0.4/P = 0.2 for systolic/diastolic blood pressure). CONCLUSIONS: HBP levels during pregnancy were shown not to differ between nulliparous and multiparous women, while CBP levels during pregnancy were higher among nulliparous than among multiparous women.

Comparison of demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters between patients with sustained normotension, white coat hypertension, masked hypertension, and sustained hypertension.

BACKGROUND: After measurement of office blood pressure (BP) and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), 4 groups of patients were identified namely: (i) sustained normotensive patients (BPs are normal both clinically and by ABPM); (ii) white coat hypertensive patients (clinical BP were above limits, but ABPM were normal); (iii) masked hypertensive patients (clinical BP were normal, but ABPM were high); (iv) sustained hypertensive patients (both office and ABPM were high). The exact pathophysiologic mechanisms of these conditions are not exactly known. Besides in the literature there are only few studies that compare the 4 groups of patients together. Thus the study was carried out to compare patients with sustained normotension (SNT), white coat hypertension (WCHT), masked hypertension (MHT), and sustained hypertension (SHT). METHODS: All patients underwent history taking, physical examination, laboratory analysis, and ABPM. They were referred to the cardiology department for echocardiographic evaluation. RESULTS: In total 85 patients with SNT, 112 patients with WCHT, 31 patients with MHT, and 81 patients with SHT were included. Going from SNT to SHT, body mass index (p<0.0001), waist circumference (p<0.0001), fasting blood glucose (p=0.002), and uric acid (p=0.029) rose progressively. Presence of metabolic syndrome was also highest in SHT and lowest in SNT (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Most of the metabolic risk factors were higher in patients with MHT and SHT when compared to SNT and WCHT. Studies are needed to determine whether metabolic risk factors play a causative role for the development of MHT and SHT.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in kidney transplant patients: RETENAL study.

Hypertension is common following renal transplantation, affecting up to 80% of transplant recipients. It is generally accepted that hypertension is associated with poor graft survival and reduced life expectancy, contributing to increased cardiovascular risk factors and mortality rates. The aim of the study was to compare the blood pressure (BP) control in kidney transplant patients through the use of ambulatory BP monitoring (ABMP) versus office BP measurements (oBP). A multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in 30 nephrology/kidney transplant units. Eligible patients included hypertensive cadaveric kidney transplant recipients aged <70 years, with a functioning kidney for at least 1 year and with an estimated glomerular filtration ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and a serum creatinine < 2.5 mg/dL. Recorded data included demographic characteristics, oBP, and ABPM and labroatory investigations. The 868 patients showed a mean recipient age of was 53.2 ± 11.6 years and mean follow-up after transplantation, 5.5 ± 2.8 years. Mean systolic and diastolic oBP were 140.2 ± 18 and 80.4 ± 10 mm Hg, respectively. Seventy-six percent of patients had oBP higher than or equal to 130/80 mm Hg. Mean 24 hour ABPM were 131.5 ± 14 and 77.4 ± 8.7 mm Hg for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively. Using the ABPM, we observed that 36.5% of subjects were controlled (mean 24-hour BP < 130/85 mm Hg). The two methods (oBP and ABPM) showed significant agreement. After ABPM, 65% of patients diagnosed as true controlled hypertension were considered to have white-coat RH. In clinical practice ABPM may help for better adjustment of drugs for adequate BP control.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with chronic kidney disease and resistant hypertension.

The role of ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) has not been well-studied in patients with chronic kidney disease and resistant hypertension. In a retrospective study of the outpatient chronic kidney disease population, 156 patients with chronic kidney disease and resistant hypertension who had 24-hour ABPM and clinic BP measurements were identified. Resistant hypertension was defined as uncontrolled clinic BP while taking ≥ 3 medications including a diuretic or controlled BP while taking ≥ 4 medications. Within the study group, ambulatory BP <130/80 mm Hg was found in 35.9% of all patients. Only 6.4% had both ambulatory and clinic BP <130/80 mm Hg. Prevalence of white-coat hypertension, masked hypertension, and sustained hypertension were 29.5%, 5.8%, and 58.3%, respectively. Compared with patients with sustained hypertension, more patients in the white-coat hypertension group had low nocturnal average systolic BP (defined as nocturnal average systolic BP <100 mm Hg) (17.4% vs 0%) and low 24-hour average diastolic BP (defined as 24-hour average diastolic BP <60 mm Hg) (52.2% vs 22%, P<.01). ABPM provides more reliable assessment of BP in patients with chronic kidney disease and resistant hypertension.